Saturday, March 31, 2018

Tashan: Explaining My Love For The Film Itself In Love With Bollywood


Almost a decade ago, I did something that would strike to most people as unbelievable. I walked out of a theatre full of people shaking their heads in disbelief, including my mother and my sibling, and I actually started smiling, not out of cynicism but out of sheer admiration. The incredulity on their faces was something to remember for a long time. But I did not care. Yes, you can say that I enjoyed 'Tashan'. 

Now, of course, in a time when cinephiles can worship Kanti Shah movies precisely for their deliberate, utterly unsubtle mediocrity, this does not sound so surprising. But back then, the giddy, deliciously nutty experience of walking out of a theatre, with the title song playing in my ears and that assorted miasma of quixotic delights still lingering in my mind, was an act of heresy, least of all to someone who was avoiding, consciously, mainstream fare in a desperate, foolhardy bid of adolescent years to be taken seriously. In a way, though, enjoying 'Tashan' liberated me from those pretensions and while I still prefer a film with real plot meat, subversive wit and solid storytelling over just glossy blockbusters, I can settle any time for a no-brainer as long as it knows how to entertain without sounding too serious about it. 

And 'Tashan' does that. The average Bollywood action film is a godawful affair, populated by blockbuster-churning superstars fitted out as paper-thin and poorly etched imitations of their counterparts in the West and cast as self-worshipping super-humans expected to not only dance their jig in midst of shoddy real life parables but also try hard to be cool about them. The women end up getting a raw deal, merely there to look gorgeous and kick ass in a selected spree of scenes which is hardly giving them a fair deal for their natural spunk. And the villains start promisingly but end up being inefficient kingpins and are even robbed of the chance  to wield some personality, let alone intelligence. Just watch 'Tiger Zinda Hai' for evidence. 

It is therefore rare to find a Bollywood masala actioner that basks in the unabashed, unashamed glory of being purely Indian in its mindset. And I am not talking about those 'Dabangg' movies which are themselves blithe and blatant recycled versions of Southern action cinema, which feels more genuinely nutty, even with all its mediocrity. I am talking about a film which celebrates the grandiose, silly, spectacular, colourful and even shamelessly but somewhat inventively rehashed essence of action cinema as we always saw coming from Bollywood throughout the decades. 


I have already poured out all my love and affection for the film's many virtues, from the film's berserk yet beautiful visual palette alternating from Yashraj-romance sublime to graphic novel frenetic to Robert Rodriguez blast-em-up to even more to how it does adequate justice to the archetype heroine with Kareena Kapoor's spirited, slim and spunky Pooja being shades fresher than the empty-headed bimbettes we get. There is also the film's cheeky film and pop-culture referencing, from a character's English equated to first George Bush and then Prince Charles (I am not revealing the final punchline, though) to the villain touting himself as a blend of Lara and Tendulkar both.  However, I would also like to make a case for two things here, one of its maker's delicious love for the very tropes that fill his film and, of course, the hero. 

If you are one who enjoys, without a shred of guilt or pretension, those preposterous Manmohan Desai multi-starrers or the kind of elaborate, grand action sagas made by the likes of Subhash Ghai and Rajiv Rai in the 1980s, you qualify for 'Tashan' too. Vijay Krishna Acharya, who penned the first two 'Dhoom' films (and even directed the abysmal third film, but more of that later), understood that perfectly, perhaps to a better extent than most of our current breed of filmmakers. While they only end up making mediocre films which try to compensate by pretending to be, in throwback fashion, deliberately self-depreciating as films of yore, Acharya ended up making a film that was not only comfortable in its silliness but also celebratory of the sometimes slipshod yet always energetic and exuberant feel of those films of yore without ever forgetting to forge its own radical path. 

In 'Tashan', the first half feels as if it belongs to a Guy Ritchie caper: slick, urban and even quirkily obsessed with flipping between languages, from Hindi to English to Hinglish. When the plot twists come, the film switches over from being a noir-lite caper, complete with a leading lady morphing into a femme fatale, into a full-fledged 80s-style potboiler yarn, with bloody revenge, the villain's silly sidekicks, adolescent romance blooming in adulthood and grand, even lengthy climaxes in the villain's massive lair, being doled out. This indulgence, however, comes across as most refreshing and it indicates just how coolly unpretentious Acharya is about his film. 

Compared to that, other big-budget Hindi action films start by trying too hard to be as slick and cutting-edge as their American counterparts and then end up sliding ridiculously into the same stew of ham-fisted cliches and much portentous intensity. 'Tashan', on the other hand, follows this template but it does not give much of a damn about logic, seriousness or even rationale to begin with. The plot is as flaky and deliberately loopholed as it should be; what amazes is how Acharya, his well-cast actors and the crew gloss over these inherent setbacks and runs with that idea of a truly freaked out Bollywood action movie. This is why that moment of transition, from referencing the West to being truly desi, feels so effortless and entertaining. 


Of course, not all of it works. The film goes on for far too long than it is supposed to. I guess that has to do with the usual overkill ambition that any newbie director brings to his work and while it is justified eventually, some of it can be a bit too ponderous, especially to the uninitiated. There could have been a lot more juicy wit and warmth in places when the narrative pauses to cut the characters some slack and while Vishal-Shekhar did serve up an exquisite and eclectically Bollywood soundtrack, the songs do delay the action and wisecracks significantly. More crucially, Acharya builds a potentially thrilling screen villain and then nearly wastes away that potential on repeating the same gimmick. Anil Kapoor's Bhaiyaji, a gaudy, garrulous kingpin, who could not have been out of place in a film like 'Tridev', is indeed quite a hoot, indefinitely more interesting and enjoyable than both hunky studs being carved out as rivals to our aggressively alpha-male heroes and arthouse actors made into forgettable punching bags for the more muscular of our leading men. See him gamely throw in gravitas of menace to his frequently hilarious Hinglish outbursts or bring unexpected warmth with that memorably goofy grin. But in the last half hour, he becomes, regrettably, only a comic book villain to be defeated and nothing else. After such a thrillingly alive turn so far, he turns out to be ultimately cardboard. 


But that is a minor complaint.  In Akshay Kumar's deliciously named Bachchan Pandey, Acharya also gives us a hero so coated with flavour, texture and charisma that I wonder why the hell didn't the screen stud trust him to helm all the increasingly mediocre action films he has done subsequently. Today, I complain about his lack of histrionic skill to pull off roles that need more capable performers but I also remember the field in which he is most comfortable and memorable, that of a fighting man who is unafraid to embrace his own lunacy without ever losing his heroism. Like Jackie Chan in those Hong Kong karate-chop comedies or Bruce Willis deflating the mock-seriousness of those 'Die Hard' movies, Kumar is utterly irresistible in 'Tashan', carrying off both the rippling essence of a truly macho hero of the heartland and a goofball with an unforgettable grin and one whom we really need to be alive and kicking at the end. He alone proves just how well the director nailed the tongue-in-cheek essence of Indian action cinema. 

It feels sad, therefore, that Bollywood chose to shove aside this odd, unlikely gem of a film (of course, the scathing reviews helped a lot in this) and chose, instead, a whole new sub-genre of mind-bogglingly mindless superstar vehicles intended to appeal to masses which had only pointless superstar celebration and nothing else. On the other hand, there were more of the shoddy, superficial Hollywood imitations that further plunged the genre into lurid depths. I regret also that Acharya himself fell prey to the latter and ended up making 'Dhoom: 3',  film which comes as a rude shock after such madcap, even inspired brilliance in the misunderstood debut. Some things don't change, I think. 

But it is nevertheless equally sad to see just how the action film genre has become so deathly dull in Hindi cinema with big studios only spending either on flimsy spy thrillers or on hinterland yarns and populated solely with big stars and nothing else. Witty action capers now belong to the unconventional talents like Sriram Raghavan and Abhishek Chaubey and nobody can take a risk on making a retro-fitted throwback of the 80s cinema (though everybody will praise the latest 'Dabangg' or 'Singham' sequel).

Gone are the days when Viju Shah's ripped-off yet rollickingly enjoyable tunes lent melody to those pulpy twists or when Mahesh Bhatt shed his arthouse sensibilities to serve compelling masala after repeated viewings of 'Lethal Weapon' and 'The Fugitive'. 'Tashan' is indeed something to be celebrated but, given the cold response it got from many, it is also something to be mourned. 

Thursday, March 29, 2018

2001: A Space Odyssey- A Golden Jubilee of Spectacle And Symphony

Sometimes, you need an epic, something truly larger-than-life to capture the incredible, jaw-dropping scale that our universe boasts of. 

And I am not talking just about space operas that spawn so many sequels, prequels and spin-offs, overarching albums by Pink Floyd or mesmerising ballads sung by David Bowie and Elton John; I am talking about something so  awe-inspiring, and not just awesome, that it takes your breath away, leaving you floating in the not-so-star studded inky black expanses of space and marvelling at every stunning sight and sound, or rather the shattering absence of sound. 

Five decades ago, long before tycoons envisioned setting controls for the heart of the Sun, a visionary named Stanley Kubrick plunged us into that first, utterly seminal and sensational experience of the universe and beyond. A space odyssey, then, in the most literal space. 

And yet while '2001' also has something of a side reputation as a film whose grasp of the science of gravity in those weightless, disorienting depths can rival decades of study done by NASA scientists, it would have only been a literal documentary on the exploration of the frontiers of space had it not been a terrific, almost thrilling cinematic experience in its own way. 


We begin with the Dawn Of Man. Scraggly apes scavenge to thrive in a bleak, desolate milieu even as they have to squabble among themselves over a water hole. One morning, something mysterious and mind-numbing pops up in their midst; moments later, set to the majestic, immortal swells of Richard Strauss' 'Also sprach Zarathustra', we see an ape smashing the skeletal remains of their new prey and while weaponry is used first for survival, it soon becomes a means to thwart those contending for the same. Even before evolution, war has begun. 


Millions of years ago, with us being shuttled through that ingeniously conceived match cut, we find ourselves sailing across the galaxy, astounded by the very incredible nature of advanced technology and our conquest of this uncharted territory but also skeptical, coolly cynical. American scientists are hushing up some truth about a discovery on the Moon with some flaky cover story that the Russians cannot help but be suspicious about. The film's main narrative has not even kicked in hitherto and yet Kubrick and co-writer British science fiction great Arthur C. Clarke have already set up a brilliant parable: apes fighting over the water hole and spacemen stashing away their intentions and other secrets underneath elaborate lies. 

One of the common complaints that most uninitiated viewers make of '2001' is that almost a chunk of it is slow, almost to the point of being glacial, and nothing much happens in the first hour, until that breathless, terse tale of moral wrangling and cold-blooded evil kicks in. It is easy to see why people would think that; Kubrick strips his waltzing, sweeping frames of dialogue and plot and instead compels us, with even maddening obsession, to go with the flow without ever telling us where we are headed. What those people miss is the beautiful, wholly organic process of his storytelling, building up note by note a labyrinth of suspense and subtext, the mood shifting effortlessly from wide-eyed wonder and even whimsy to an uncanny sense of uncertainty and even fear. 


'2001' is also filled to the brim with delicious nuance, which is unexpectedly subversive for a film mounted on such a mammoth scale. For all the narrative leisure that Kubrick lends to the film, there is just so much to observe at, so much to savour and enjoy. '2001' lingers, not only on those rotating spaceships and ethereal vistas of the Earth and the Moon, but on the smallest of details, from stewardesses struggling to walk down aisles in space airships with their grip shoes to scientists video-calling their daughters right down to unexpectedly hilarious bits in which they try to figure out zeo-gravity toilets and out of nowhere, a fountain pen floats weightlessly, reiterating the sight of a rudimentary bone descending unforgettably from the sky. It is also extremely, almost forcefully poetic, the always absorbing silent scenes reminding us of the not-so-uncanny similarities between the African wilderness of the prehistoric past and the pitted, disgruntled surface of the Moon itself, something that is more than just a coincidence. 


So much in '2001', in fact, is more than just coincidence. As the film's latter hour tugs us into the water-tight atmosphere of two unsmiling, almost disillusioned astronauts (one sunbathes and plays virtual chess while the other makes sketches of astronauts hibernating) pitted together in the film's literal odyssey and then hurtled into danger, we are plunged from wistful admiration and observation to almost sweaty, perspiring tension. I would hate to reveal the film's arch villain here to the uninitiated but when even the same has his moment of comeuppance, it is still hard to shake off the feeling of that almost claustrophobic, utterly eerie dread that precedes it. 


Yet, all that would be only mental masturbation if the film did not deliver so splendidly, so subversively on the spectacle. That much-touted visual wizardry and that sublime use of symphony are really worth the praise and stand up remarkably even today. Working in tandem with legendary cinematographer Geoffrey Unsworth (who also shot 'Superman') and special effects veteran Douglas Trumbull, the director unleashed also all his scientific knowledge, unrivalled technical prowess and obsessive taste for perfection in crafting the marvels that feel so iconic today and must have felt audaciously revolutionary back in 1968. From gigantic centrifuges to recreate the gravity, or rather the lack of it, in space (a technique that Christopher Nolan would use for 'Inception') to the meticulously conceived plethora of lights and colours in the famous 'Star Gate' sequence right down to the ingenious use of front-projection, everything feels as fresh and vivid as it was back then and the sheer marvellous quality of '2001' refuses to age or fade away. The use of music is beautiful, so stirring in its elegance and poetry that it lends a throbbing heart to even the merely contemplative moments in the narrative. 



It is a film that begs every time for revisionism. My first feelings on watching '2001' were, like for any other first-time viewer, those of sheer incredulity and disappointment. It was less to do with the minimal exposition and the symbolic enigma of the orchestral finale and more of Kubrick's frequently misunderstood coldness in approaching the human characters populating his overarching canvas. But subsequent viewings, as I can vouch, will present truly the miracles of the film and also explain the essence of his deliberate formality of tone. By making his characters helpless against both predestined doom and discovery, he also proves that it is only the worthy who deserve the enlightenment and progress that the universe holds for us. 

'2001: A Space Odyssey' is quite unlike anything else in this much-abused genre of films and while many a great film has threatened to beat its influence, there is still something hypnotic, almost overwhelming about surrendering to its Herculean vision. In today's times, when almost every few months we are given science fiction that is all about hefty concepts and little about the crucial importance of truly groundbreaking storytelling, here is a film to be treasured time and again to be reminded about the pure power of a true auteur in top form, wielding all his strength and grace to pave the way forward, not just to new cinematic benchmarks and even to the universe.