‘Aren’t they friends now?’ asked John Connor in James
Cameron’s superlative ‘Terminator 2- Judgment Day’; he was obviously referring
to America’s hitherto favorite enemies- Russians. Yet, in the world of Guy
Ritchie’s latest rollicking spy caper, the yodeling Yankees and the sneaky
Soviets can actually be, not just friends, but also partners in a mission to
save the world. And no, as the KGB boss of this film’s red-necked Russian
tough-guy informs him, one should never kill his partner on the first day of
the mission.
Such wishful thinking itself makes ‘The Man From U.N.C.L.E’
such a must-watch for the fans of the ready-made spy thriller genre but
Ritchie, one of the most unabashedly cocky and cheeky directors of recent
times, has also laced the indulgent meat with the choicest sauce of the
freewheeling zing best associated with the decade of The Beatles, Flower Power
and ‘Dr. Strangelove’- I am talking of course the colorful and freaked out 60s,
also incidentally the era when both the super-powers were embattled in the
fiercest space and missile race as well as the most entrenched propaganda (as
portrayed faithfully by the wonderfully jazzy opening credits).
Yet the reason quite why we still hold in fascination the old
James Bond films, even as the newer outings boast of more political relevance
and riskier stakes, is how that chunk of 60s cinema has often captured the
turbulent, far-from-cold war in firmly tongue-in-cheek ways and the result has
been great entertainment cinema- escapism filled with charm and campy
camaraderie.
‘The Man From U.N.C.L.E’ is not quite clever as those
wonderfully unassuming films of yore but boy, it does best what it sets out to
do- serve a simple, largely guessable and even politically sterile spy movie
premise with a sizzling 60s sauce of frothy color, cheeky humor and- most
crucially- a wonderful and whimsical sense of crackling bromance that alone
makes the entire stylish-looking film soar, much like James Bond’s reliable
jetpack.
If all this sounds a bit too serious like a Le Carre
paperback, rest assured it isn’t. This is a film packed literally with glitz
and goof- with Ritchie and co-writer Lionel Ingram making the proceedings
refreshingly laidback and more content with the sparkling wit flowing in the
verbal repartee and the overall feel to the enterprise rather than detailing
itself. This is a film which throws its oddly matched lead pair into a plucky
adventure filled with more spills than thrills. It is positively hilarious to
see the two ace cloaks and daggers fumbling in a sunbaked, Euro-pudding Rome
and with enough juicy nuance to these riotously comic set-pieces. Kuryakin, for
instance, a tough guy, who when explaining his brawn under disguise intones
that he jogs, has a luggage of psychotic batshit behind him and often finds it
slipping from his meaty grasp on the field while Solo, a cocky, self-assured
scrounger of the highest order, can also fall prey to the most melting of all
seductions.
All these are great moments ripe for the film to deliver
brilliant, well-earned guffaws, and some may suspect that ‘The Man From
U.N.C.L.E’, despite taking quite a lot of the zing from the famous TV series,
is Ritchie’s eye-rolling pastiche of the spy genre- the same way his London
gangster yarns of the 90s. But make no mistake; even beneath the back-slapping
hilarity, there is some actual heart to this deliciously flaky plotting. Much
of the film’s emotional throb and comic spontaneity is amply provided by the
remarkably natural and well-timed chemistry between its male leads. To begin
with, both resent each other’s tastes and espionage technologies and yet,
driven by something far more significant than their respective missions, they
stick together nevertheless and end up becoming uncanny buddies. It is this
wonderfully fresh bromance between these two leads- between the hunk and the
chunk that makes the film so endearing, even when its cylinders are not quite
firing.
Yet, it doesn’t quite matter to Ritchie whether they have to
fire or not. There is a wonderfully languid and leisurely feel to this thing
and while this might disappoint those expecting a surge of adrenalin that the
director brings to even his most flawed outings, all this rather looks and
sounds sublime, given how finely crafted it all is. In the middle of the film’s
relentless and voluntarily funny spills of the spy tropes, there is a truly
wonderful moment- scored beautifully to a piece of classical radio music- when
a boat pursuit going in the backdrop is rendered secondary to some classic
indulgence- a swig of a drink, a bit of a loaded sandwich and some nice, wry
contemplation. The scene sums up the film’s approach pretty well- this is a
film cheerfully taking itself not even an ounce seriously. Ritchie is all in
the surface- adding his own typical zingy, whimsical and split-screen trickery
all set to a killer score (shot marvelously by John Mathieson) and shooting the
locations with an inspired blend of Bond-style kitsch and when two spies in
disguise take a night walk near the ruins of a Roman gallery, we can recognize
a nicely placed nod from ‘North By Northwest’. There is more of this clever
film-referencing in a scene modeled on a similar situation in the Roger
Moore-classic ‘Live And Let Die’. Perfect.
Some of this fascinatingly frippery blend of original quirk
and inspired pastiche also becomes darkly serious, in the most self-assured way
possible. The fascinating score, for one thing, when not echoing jazz classics
of the age, often swells up like Ennio Morricone’s instruments in top, slinky
form- Ritchie uses these crescendos subtly and perceptively- and in one
unforgettable scene, things turn extraordinarily menacing and truly dark- with
an evil scientist justifying his devilish intentions with all the delusional
grandeur of a classic villain straight out of Tarantino. Ritchie also packs in
the right amount of snap and slink- his dialogue quick, quirky and solidly
punchy even with memorable nods to whether Dior matches with Paco Rabbane or
not- as well as welcome digs at technological glitches as well as the right
mannerisms and culture clashes.
The action, however, is purely incidental- both good and a
bit of a downer. The opening hilarious yet exhilarating defection- with the two
agents battling it out, one with brains, the other with brawns- is a hell of a
white-knuckle chase, fashioned like a breakneck Looney Tunes chase and a final
vehicular rumble through the thick jungle packs in much sober punch but in
between, we have mostly comic standoffs when one would expect some more heat.
In the old Bond films, things often ended with a big bang- some contrived yet
spectacular finale inside some hidden fortress, hideout, lair or even in some
exotic locale and this film merely ends with a stellar joke- not a bad idea,
really but what about a bomb defused with a password that reads ‘UNCLE’?
Nevertheless, there is plenty of wit between the proceedings and this alone
overcomes the flimsiness of the material all around- there are some little
nuggets that are absolute surprises, adding some wonderful sophistication to
the show on display. And boy, the casting works wonders.
Henry Cavill, a delicious-looking Brit, who was last seen
squirming unhappily in his other-worldly superhero tights, is an absolute blast
as Solo, looking uncannily like a resurrected Roger Moore with a jet-black mane
of brilliantine and, it must be noted, drastically lesser ham. He knows his way
in a dapper suit quite well and it is his assured ways in the film that add to
the buttery-smoothness. He is quite a charmer, literally, delivering his lines
with finesse and using his hands and silver-coated tongue to whistle-worthy
effect.
The women bring the heat but also remain firmly interesting
themselves- Alicia Vikander’s Gaby is a sun-kissed beauty blessed with a
deceptive sweetness as well as an enigmatic stare that makes her so deliciously
sketchy. And Elizabeth Debicki is a truly terrifying vamp- her Victoria is the
film’s equivalent of a classic Bond villain and she also serves as a great
femme fatale. The way she gazes hawk-like at a near-unconscious Solo in the
velvety grip of her manicured talons is both richly sensuous and supremely
unsettling in the old-school way.
Yet no one gets the beat of this twisted caper quite like
Armie Hammer, as the thick-headed Soviet Kuryakin. It is perhaps a seemingly
gigantic miscast- for Hammer is every bit a muscular American in contrast to
the normal exotic flavor that the Eastern portrayal usually requires. But what
is wondrous is how Hammer makes it all so believable. He is convincingly rugged
and thuggish in his ballsy action sequences and looks truly badass when ripping
off the butt of a car but he is equally lovable when insisting that Gaby,
playing his supposed fiancé in the spy con, should dress according to his
whims. He is quite a goof when simmering silently to the point of using his
fists and equally slick when chucking at the American bugs placed inside his
hotel room and announcing that they are technologically inferior as well. And
he is absolutely a blast when narrating, with prudent seriousness and equal
slipperiness, that Rome’s Spanish Steps are actually a Soviet creation, echoing
a trenchant form of propaganda.
‘The Man From U.N.C.L.E’ is a crowd-pleaser in the purest
sense possible- a wonderful flaky piece of entertainment- brimming with some
well-used spy clichés, adding some genuine little twists and turns and making
the most of the dazzling 60s style and its superbly confident cast to craft
both a nice buddy adventure- something like ‘Butch Cassidy And The Sundance
Kid’ of the cloak and dagger genre- as well as an old-school caper. It might
not have ground-breaking thrills or a searing narrative punch but who cares?
‘Kingsman –The Secret Service’ has already delivered the former, while
‘Spectre’ is just a few months away to deliver the latter and perhaps, for the
moment, all we need is a bit of the same laidback moment of bemused, grinning
reflection- accompanied with a few delectable surprises in that box on the
seat. Ritchie doles them out and with great, tasty sauce to go along with them.
As Solo would ask, 'How is that for entertainment'?
My Rating- Three and a half stars out of Five
No comments:
Post a Comment